Using EU ETS Auctioning Revenues for Climate Action
What is the appetite for earmarking within specific EU member states?
(BRIEFING PAPER)
A Germanwatch szervezésében - a MEHI közreműködésével - készült tanulmány a szén-dioxid kvótabevételek klímavédelmi célú felhasználásának szabályozását mutatja be EU szerte.
(A dokumentum elérhető a bal oldali sávban, vagy az alábbi linken: http://germanwatch.org/en/6853)
Közreműködő szervezetek: MEHI, Polish Climate Coalition, RAC France, Sance pro budovy, Greenpeace Central Eastern Europe, Kepa Finland
TARTALOM 1 Introduction 2 Addressing the needs - using EU ETS revenues for climate-related expeditures 2.1 Climate financing needs - domestically and globally 2.2 EU ETS revenues - A promising source for international and national climate financing? 2.2.1 The use of the EU ETS revenues: The recomendation of the EU ETS directive as a compromise 2.2.2 The EU ETS and its recent problems: Need for reparation to increase the certificate price 3 Earmarking: A sensible means? 3.1 Budgetary earmarking: Advantages and disadvantages 3.2 Political earmarkingh: What does this mean? 3.3 Case study Germany: The Special Energy and Climate Fund 4 Appetite for earmarking within specific EU Memeber States? 4.1 Case studies of specific EU Member States 4.1.1 Case study: Poland 4.1.2 Case study: France 4.1.3 Case study: Finland 4.1.4 Case study: Romania 4.1.5 Case study: Czech Republic 4.1.6 Case study: Hungary 5 Conclusion 6 References